I think he would make a decent hooker, but couldnt see him leaving Wakefield to play hooker.



Just can see brough and Dobson working at halfback, would be a strange signing IMO.

Its David Blaine bringing a bit of magic to the team

The whole 'DB' thing. The B is just below the G on the keyboard. Maybe Durham Giant was just signing his post...?

No he is going to Celtic...oh hang on, they rung him and told him they cant honour his contract offer

He wont be playing hooker all the time if at any time

This only makes any sense (and then not much) if Paul Cooke is leaving. Scrum half to replace a stand off, hmmm where have I seen that before? Leroy Joe anyone?

PC to LF, DB TO SH, MD TO SO, SM TO HOOKER???

Scott Murrell is a great 13, but will never be a 9, not quick enough for me, in the times he's played there he's looked poor.

I agree, why would we want him and how would he fit in. TBH, I don't see why a hooker cannot do 80 mins, we don't need to interchange hookers, yes its handy to have a player on the bench who can play their from a utility position (like Fitzy or BenC), but I don't think we need to specifically sign a hooker (unless we are getting rid of Fish).



If we ended up with Brough(a scrum half who has played hooker), would he be happy being a bit part player to Dobbo and Fish.



Personally, I would get Fitzy to stay if the quota can stand it, he is a good player and I reckon if he was used as first choice hooker and played for 80 mins you would see a whole different side in attack.

Anybody else you'd like to play out of position?

I'm afraid you will never be the coach at Rovers with that opinion, thank goodness you are not and the above will not be the case