If Tickle does go i dont see the need in replacing him as i would just give Burnett more of a chance, he really deserves it.

I know what you mean, I really rate Burnett and would like to give him more games. But I think with another quality back rower, we could be able to rotate more. Plus is you have with Tickle's wages, you might aswell use them.

Yeah suppose but if Gleeson comes in then he will be using them lol.

As good as Gleeson is, we just dont need him.

I agree, would much prefer Hall there, younger, lot less wages, home made

lol.

We pretty much agree on next seasons team apart from the left wing.

Well IMO Briscoe has done more than enough to cement his place in the startin line up, i actually think he is our best winger and he will only get better so he has to be in it for me

I found it hard to leave him out but I think one more season as back up is okay. However, if Calderwood, Yeaman, Hall and Raynor get injured he'd be staright in.

signng gleeson is a backward step imo, too slow and predictable

Heard today that he is on his way to us.Me personally NO,lets go with the centres we have got.

what a load of dribble! he's only just signed a big deal with wigan halfway through the season from warrington, really think hull would pay a release fee for a player who hasnt played well for years? oh wait! forgot its hull, get him signed!





player exchange wont happen aswell, can you really see gleeson wanting to fock about joining his third club in a year??? not gonna happen. i think fc will be looking at young players in the national league but wouldnt be suprised if nothing happens on the signing front.

exchange with tickle who is also under contract??