Try for me.



In slow motion in looked far worse than it actually was and for me this was another example of how poor Roberts can be in defence as he had the opportunity to just gather the ball safely but he hesitated and Warrington were unfortunate not to get the try.

Dont be daft, had it been the other way round the casuals would have been looking to fight with more than just stewards.

there was no fighting last night, you contiue to spout libelous clap trap, get over yourselves, the average age of that conga was 12 ffs. do you try and cause trouble deliberately or are you just bitter because you got thrown out last week? (of the cup)

IMO it wasnt a try, Riley raised his hand to Amos, and from the angle ehind them it looked like a push. Amos did take a hell of a dive though. If Riley had kept his hands down it would have resulted in a try being given as Ganson would have ruled that as a 'Shoulder Charge'. Correct decision in my view.

BTW I don't condone Amos taking the dive. It was quite pathetic to see a grown man flying to deck from the softest of touches. It was almost like, dare I say, Football.

no way was that a try

It was a try but bridges should ever have been given.

I despair when i read some of this.

The same people who are trying to find excuses of why the ref was right would be screaming about the injustice of it not being given if the player was in Cherry and White.



For crying out loud.



Open both your eyes and ignore the colour of the jerseys and that was a try.

No question.



And their first try does not even come into the debate.



If your going to discuss things at least look at them properly ffs



rant over

Really, Sky TV and 11,000 witnesses would disagree.







Much more libellous than anything I said treacle.

and what about the 11,000 people who saw stewards being punched and pushed down steep concrete steps?



Cant believe your trying to justify it!! Probably one of the hillbilly chavs yourself!!