No that I disagree with you buddy, but I am keen to hear the benefits to the comp of a bigger home average attendance and also the benefits for the other teams with Featherstone replacing London.



Home attendances are the problem of the home tea,. Sky have visited London twice this year if IIRC, so it's hardly an image thing given 90,000 or less tune in when we are on the box.

Away attendances are an urban myth perpetuated by the people at the top of clubs who should have more fans...like St Helens and HKA.

If a visiting team bring 1,000 fans that pay 20 quid each, then London Broncos and Catalan Dragons cost the northern mafia 20 grand at best. 1.3 million is the TV revenue and at an 8,500 average another million in ticket sales is a starting point fro clubs incomes...so London cost a team like St Helens about 0.009% of their annual turn over because our fans travel on a skateboard to away games.

Will Feathersone Rovers deliver 1,000 more fans to St Helens than London? Tell you what, if they deliver 2,000 more then St Helens will be 1.7% better off.....and Pit Village Rugby will become more of a northern Hobby and less of a national sport.



Hey, the game will live on without us, but as a professional sport, it will struggle. No London team will effect the TV deal next time.....NATIONAL REACH is important to advertisers and the fact that London games on SKY attract 30% less viewers than other games shows that the "50% of viewers in the South" claim is flawed at best.



As for London?



I've said it elsewhere.....cut our cloth accordingly at the Hive in SL next year with a view to dropping down a division in 2014 but (surprise surprise) bust a gut trying to attract a new set of fans to the club. I believe many ST holders would not desert the club if they were to drop to the Championship, but the community feel needs to be reintroduced and a fa greater level of openness delivered. The Volunteers that were so shoddily treated a few years back will need to be re-engaged and when it comes to the clever marketing needs to be done, no ads in Walkabouts, no liveried Taxis, no bloody Oyster card holders and no flowers on round-a-bouts either.



Yes, a winning team would help, but let's face it, you still have to let people know we exist

The attendances aren't key but they do reflect spending power. London's income is very small and this means that for them to flex their wallet, they need a very generous backer. Fev have higher income and lower costs, their backer doesn't need to be quite so generous.



I think for me the key is that non-SL clubs continue to dream the dream. In inviting an unfashionable club like Fev into the top ranks (even if they don't last very long), we allow fans of other unfashionable clubs to buy into the idea that their club might also do the same. Something that is vital for the health of the game.

The WC will be fine.



You miss the problems that LOndon has, the main one being money. Raise the cap, double it, treble it, does this mean that they will have any more money to spend? Nope not a penny more.



I am quite okay about the idea that the cap should include London weighting but it's a moot point because they can't afford to spend the full cap anyway.



And foreigners...this is out of date. You can't get decent Australasians now because of the strength of the Aussie economy and the recent NRL Tv deals. The NRL clubs have so much muscle now that SL players move south not vice versa. And you can't get decent up and coming Aussies from below the NRL because of the clamp-down on visas under Cameron. The bulk of London's squad will have to be home grown, it is a shame that Broncos couldn't have held on for another 5 years or so as a SL club.

2,213 Average this year and we spent to the cap.....Wigan average 14,699 and spend the same amount on players salaries. Attendances are not the reason London are teetering on the edge.....the ability to invest the benefactors money wisely is 100% why we are on the edge.



10,000 average is often spoken about as the break even figure for a SL club.......although I believe the figure was first mentioned in respect of HKA and they own their own ground, so maybe 10,500 average to cover the rent.



5 Clubs currently hit the magic 10k, with 2 of them paying rent to a soccer stadium....Wigan and Hull are generally very good at marketing themselves so should be right, whilst Leeds, Saints and Wire are all pretty safe for now.

The Next 4 are 75% or better of the way there and can probably get themselves there.....but whinging CEO's complaining and making excuses for their marketing departments failings and the apathy of their fans don't help....if they get over the 10k mark they'll have another 500k to spend!



The Bottom 5 are the concern....London is a given, Salford will have to bus kids in for free to get close to 5k next year and if they don't challenge for honours, the Dr may walk, Widnes and Castleford are cutting their cloth accordingly but will struggle to see real improvement without 3rd party investment and Huddersfield are not dissimilar to London with the exception that Northern Lads will sign for them so they can carry on living at home.

Wigan can spend the full cap and still make a profit. London can only spend the full cap if Mr Hughes spends a few million. Even after the year you've had if you'd made a profit, Hughes wouldn't be looking to reduce his commitments. It would have been a poor year on-field but it wouldn't have cost him an arm and a leg. Now Fev almost certainly won't spend the full cap but they can outspend Broncos in the long-run.



Salford will still be a long way from challenging for honours next year. If they finish mid-table it will be a good improvement.

Hughes said he could not afford to bankroll the club at the current level indefinitely. Somebody told him that spending to the cap in pursuit of glory was the best way to build self sustainability.......it was a flawed exercise from the moment he agreed to it. We've had play-offs and we've had Wembley..........what we've NEVER had is a competent Marketing Department.









The 12-12 to 8-8-8 model will see slight movement between teams in the middle 8 with some getting into the top 12 from time to time, but as long as London receive no allowance on the cap for weighting, then they will be at a disadvantage.





The Good Dr doesn't come across as the most patient of men.....no play-offs in 2014 and heads will roll......nothing by 2015 and he'll be outta there!

Why not go the whole way and just give London the SL trophy and Challenge Cup , cancel the season and let the players have a year out .

Just how much more aid does this white elephant need? And don't worry about the game , it was here before the London experiment and will be here after .



Don't blame anyone but your owners and coaches , they bring in the players who don't perform for whatever reasons, and of course the total apathy of Londoners to the game

What "aid" has London been given in SL?

As part of the plan to rescue pit village rugby from bankruptcy and dwindling interest, Sky wanted a London and Paris team...without them the game would still be semi-pro. Other than that, London haven't been given any "aid"........unlike Crusaders, or dare I say Bradford.

'fella'?!



How many sports do you know that have died? It doesn't happen and wont happen to the game. Backward step maybe but it won't die, and if LB die (which is a very real possibility) I'll continue to follow this great game and support another team.

Fev's quest for SL glory here :- www.loverugbyleague.com/news_130 ... hance.html

Fev's quest for SL glory here :- www.loverugbyleague.com/news_130 ... hance.html

I always thought this was a London Broncos board? Featherstone?

Read previous page.