reading the article it states "bulls decided against signing" which in my eyes suggested Walker may have signed but Bulls havent...therefor unfortunately Mr Walker Tough titties...both parties ahave to sign a biniding agreement before its binding, involving the RFL over here wont help your case now will it...

Hands up who has already got Orford printed on the back of there new home shirt?





I don't think there is much to worry about tbh. It doesn't sound as if contracts have been signed and its just a natural 'up in arms' reaction from the Walker party.

It was never going to be straightforward was it? That would be too much to ask....

Given that the only side of the story on offer is that of Chris Walker's agent, I shall not be reading too much into this at this point.

Next thing you know, we'll be accused of having "cohersed" Orford into signing...

I'll be keeping my powder dry on this one. Suggest others do the same.

Unless you're a troll in which case keep it as wet as an otter's pocket.

What's that then?

unless the bulls faxed the contract to walkers agent, how else would he have seen whats on offer, i can't see him complaining if he hadn't signed the contract

Maybe, if the contract exists, it had a getout clause if Walker's visa was rejected, and maybe he had his visa rejected and is reapplying.



Maybe maybe maybe...

Let's hope it's all sorted OK. I for one am looking forward to hopefully seeing Orford up against Buderus next year when our teams meet.



2 of my favourite NRL players of last few years against each other.

A long story with a bad ending