Was the right call but just as easy a call as Ade Gardeners no try which Ganson wanted to be extra sure about, or Eastmonds for that matter.

He went to the video ref for Gardner's because the linesman told him about Webb's vicious assault.





And he went to it on Eastmond's because he was desperate for the right moral outcome

You really need to stop listenting to those muppets in the Sky commentary box.

Is this the same vicious assault that the disciplinary comittee decided no charge for?

That's the one.

TVOC tells me that the press are the closest thing to experts after head coaches, so I guess he agrees that we wuz robbed

The refs are the only experts.



The press may be the closest thing to head coaches, but unfortunately they are still hundreds of miles away. You only have to listen to them to know that.

I agree, as I often prove on here.

Brilliant article if only to see the over the top reaction from shot-from-the-hip Leeds fans unable to see through an artcile designed to provoke controversy on the basis that the game is little more than chip paper in Liverpool.

As with everything there has to be exceptions that prove the rule and that goes for coaches, players and referees also.







It's not ther sort of proof the referees are ideally looking for though.



__________



I note that Brent Webb has gone from a warning letter to a formal caution - so what can he expect the next time he drops with the knees defending the tryline?



A severe wagging of the finger perhaps.

One of those horrible stares teachers used to do at primary school. He'd soon learn his lesson

He should learn to go in feet first as opposed to with his knees. The authorities seem to see that as ok.